Well, now, this means that Tiger has now completed a resume requirement for election to high office as a Democrat.  You can do this in New York if you want to go the state level, but clearly, I mean this is Clintonesque, and client number nine, Eliot Spitzer, who was the governor of New York.  A friend of mine said today, "Well, if that's true then this is it.  That will be the end of Woods now, if it wasn't already."  What's the difference?  What's the difference?  In fact, many of the African-American columnists who have written about this have suggested it would have made more sense to pay for it than go through all this stuff because they generally have more security and privacy.  Of course that's blown up.

I ask you the question again:  What's worse, Tiger paying for sex with his money or Democrat Max Baucus, a senator, paying for sex with taxpayer money?  Now, it's rumor about Woods.  We just have this New York Daily News story, but for the sake of argument, let's look at Tiger Woods versus Max Baucus.  Let's say that Tiger spent his money on a woman for his adult needs.  Compare that with what the Politico is reporting on Democrat Senator Max Baucus of Montana, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, the author, in large part, of this debacle of a health care bill in the Senate.  Democrat Max Baucus gave a $14,000 pay raise, which is taxpayer money, to his love interest staffer and then took her on a taxpayer-funded trip. Trying to reach a decision here.  There are laws against prostitution in some states, but there may not be a law against what Baucus did.  Tiger's married, but so was Baucus. 

(click for full article)

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121109/content/01125107.guest.html

Comments (1)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

...
written by Jill Lang, December 20, 2009

What about Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu?? Aren't they whoring around, too?? Isn't this against the law or something??

I'm disgusted with these people!

• 
• +0
• 
•